Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

A reduce court may not rule against a binding precedent, even if it feels that it really is unjust; it could only express the hope that a higher court or maybe the legislature will reform the rule in question. When the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the legislation evolve, it may both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts of the cases; some jurisdictions allow for just a judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents in the boy or Lady will not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they might do if they are able to Minimize off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man that is a major, the pair is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by regulation.

When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is usually only carried out In the event the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence along with the petitioner company responded on the allegations as a result they were perfectly aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to generally be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Plainly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion involves a move into a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, on the other hand, supplies financial relief by placing an employee inside of a higher fork out scale, without switching their occupation duties or position. It's a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained in the same fork out scale for a lengthy time, particularly when they lack options for promotion. Upgradation is often a policy Software used to ease the hardship of lengthy-term stagnation. Read more

The proposal appears to be reasonable and acceded to. While in the meantime police shall remain neutral during the private dispute between the parties, however, if any with the individuals is indulged in criminal action the police shall take prompt action against them under law. five. The moment petition is disposed of in the above terms. Read more

27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a very criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically bring about exoneration from departmental charges based on the same factual grounds. Whilst a writ under Article 199 is available in specific limited situations, it can be generally not the suitable remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-take a look at witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't influence the department of his/her innocence.

Because of this, only citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Consider it as calling an individual to inform them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in this sort of-and-these types of community, without actually offering them an address. Driving throughout the community seeking to find their phone is probably going to get more frustrating than it’s value.

Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, including the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, providing a worthwhile resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.

twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons acquiring their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to become inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to carry out absent with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.

In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Although the pair had two youthful children of their personal at home, the social worker did not explain to them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report on the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement inside the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the pair had youthful children.

156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad here Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion would be the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion may very well be claimed or granted without the actual length of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular length of service for getting entitled to get regarded for promotion to the higher quality, of course, will not be without logic since the officer who's initially inducted into a particular post needs to serve within the claimed post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and also to serve the public in a befitting way.

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” usually are not binding, but can be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.